Even the Liberals Know Obama Was Lying

In his unique and brilliant style, Vin Suprynowicz analyzes the State of the Union address. He can tell it was pack of lies because of the total silence from those who would be outraged if they believed Obama was telling the truth.

For instance, the president said, according to the White House’s prepared transcript: “We should continue the work of fixing our broken immigration system — to secure our borders, enforce our laws, and ensure that everyone who plays by the rules can contribute to our economy and enrich our nation.

Gee that sounds good doesn't it? So where are the screams of protest from the pro-illegal immigration groups?

Did you see any headlines in the days following the president’s speech, reporting “Immigration advocates” (meaning “Illegal Immigration advocates,” of course ) “express outrage at border-sealing initiative / La Raza and ACLU file lawsuit against deadly land-mine plan?”

Of course not. No one responded as though the president meant it — or even bothered to ask if he meant it — because they all knew he was lying, mouthing tested but blatantly untrue things merely to assuage those rubes out there in the sticks.

The media, as usual, was completely bamboozled too:

But no reporter even checked back to see when he plans to start; no radical group in favor of the reconquest of Aztlan bothered to voice a protest and file a lawsuit seeking an injunction against the coming round-ups and mass deportations. Why? Because they all know Mr. Obama was lying up a storm.

The tried and true method of determining if a politician is lying involves direct observation:  If his (or her) lip are moving he (or she) is lying.  With his State of the Union Address, Mr Obama has added a new way of making that critical determination: Observe the reaction of those who would normally be outraged if they believed what the politician was saying.