Stupid Argument from the Washington Post

In an editorial tited, Congressional efforts to repeal D.C. gun laws imperil homeland security the editor asks,

Imagine parents who have lost a family member to gun violence having to allow a renter to possess firearms. No state imposes such restrictions on private landowners, so why is this a good idea in a city where motorcades of high government officials and foreign dignitaries are an almost-daily routine?

Imagine parents who lost a son to Islamic fighters in the Middle East having to rent to Muslims. Why is is a good ideas to allow Muslims into a city "...where motorcades of high government officials and foreign dignitaries are an almost-daily routine?"